- 3 lbs small red potatoes, scrubbed and cut in half
- 1/4 cup olive oil
- 4 cloves of garlic, coarsely chopped
- 2 bay leaves
- 1 tsp dried oregano
- Coarse salt, freshly ground pepper to taste
- 1 lemon cut in half
- 2 Tbsp unsalted butter
- 2 Tbsp fresh dill
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Blog #8: Recipe
Monday, May 31, 2010
Homemade Mac and Cheese!
Ingredients
- 1/2 pound elbow macaroni
- 3 tablespoons butter
- 3 tablespoons flour
- 1 tablespoon powdered mustard
- 3 cups milk
- 1/2 cup yellow onion, finely diced
- 1 bay leaf
- 1/2 teaspoon paprika
- 1 large egg
- 12 ounces sharp cheddar, shredded
- 1 teaspoon kosher salt
- Fresh black pepper
Topping:
- 3 tablespoons butter
- 1 cup panko bread crumbs
Directions
Preheat oven to 350 degrees F.
In a large pot of boiling, salted water cook the pasta to al dente.
While the pasta is cooking, in a separate pot, melt the butter. Whisk in the flour and mustard and keep it moving for about five minutes. Make sure it's free of lumps. Stir in the milk, onion, bay leaf, and paprika. Simmer for ten minutes and remove the bay leaf.
Temper in the egg. Stir in 3/4 of the cheese. Season with salt and pepper. Fold the macaroni into the mix and pour into a 2-quart casserole dish. Top with remaining cheese.
Melt the butter in a saute pan and toss the bread crumbs to coat. Top the macaroni with the bread crumbs. Bake for 30 minutes. Remove from oven and rest for five minutes before serving.
Remember to save leftovers for fried Macaroni and Cheese.
Preheat oven to 350 degrees F.
In a large pot of boiling, salted water cook the pasta to al dente.
While the pasta is cooking, in a separate pot, melt the butter. Whisk in the flour and mustard and keep it moving for about five minutes. Make sure it's free of lumps. Stir in the milk, onion, bay leaf, and paprika. Simmer for ten minutes and remove the bay leaf.
Temper in the egg. Stir in 3/4 of the cheese. Season with salt and pepper. Fold the macaroni into the mix and pour into a 2-quart casserole dish. Top with remaining cheese.
Melt the butter in a saute pan and toss the bread crumbs to coat. Top the macaroni with the bread crumbs. Bake for 30 minutes. Remove from oven and rest for five minutes before serving.
Remember to save leftovers for fried Macaroni and Cheese.
I Love Fried Chicken
BUTTERMILK-SOAKED FRIED CHICKEN | |||||||
| |||||||
| BUTTERMILK-SOAKED FRIED CHICKEN Ingredients 1 1/2 cups cups buttermilk 3 teaspoons Lawry's® Seasoned Salt 2 1/2 to 3 pounds chicken, cut into serving pieces 1 cup all-purpose flour 1/2 teaspoon Lawry's® Seasoned Pepper Vegetable oil for frying Directions 1. In large, resealable plastic bag, combine buttermilk with 1 teaspoon Lawry's® Seasoned Salt. Add chicken; turn to coat. Close bag and marinate in refrigerator 30 minutes.
2. Remove chicken from marinade, discarding marinade. In another large, resealable plastic bag, combine flour, remaining 1 teaspoon Seasoned Salt and pepper. Add chicken, one piece at a time, and shake to coat well.
3. Meanwhile, in deep 12-inch skillet, heat 1-inch oil to 365°. Add chicken and cook, turning twice, 25 minutes or until chicken is golden brown and thoroughly cooked. Drain on rack or paper towels. | |||||||
pasta
Past & Present
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Credibility
The site that I found to be the most credible/reliable would have to be the tinyurl one. The reason I chose this one would be because it is a scholarly article that is written by an author with a PhD. The author has no reason to have a bias for or against genetically modified organisms. The article was written with intent to educate and not persuade in any way. It is a very clear article that is mostly up to date but not certainly. The order of the next two sites was much more difficult. Personally, I would not say that either of them are very reliable. If I had to put them in order, I would have to say that saynotogmos would be next reliable and in last place would be monsanto. The deciding factor for me on these two was the fact that monsanto is a .com vs. the .org. Although they both have a serious bias, monsanto is trying to sell their product. Marketing can really skew information to make it more appealing. Monsanto's website was created by people that work for monsanto and with the intent to make their product look as positive and appealing as possible to their potential clientele. They only mention the good things about genetically modified organisms without addressing that there are adverse affects from their product. Although the saynotogmos is not a .com and isn't trying to sell anything, I believe they really are trying to sell something. They aretrying to sell their idea. The page was created by volunteers in Texas. That tells us that just about anybody could have volunteered and written whatever they wanted on there. That doesn't come across as reliable to me. There is a clear message to stop GMO's, so it is clear what their intent is. Also it appears that they are targeting the general public which also concerns me. If they are just trying to get anybody to jump on the bandwagon, they might just say whatever it takes. I have never had any issues with eating genetically modified foods. I have been eating them unknowingly for as long as I remember. To my knowledge, I haven't suffered from any illnesses due to the genetically modified foods thus far, so why should I be concerned? I feel like any ill-affects that they may have, our bodies have adapted to and built a tolerance against them. The only reason I could come up with for the USA to not want to label the GMO's on foods, was just being afraid to change the status quo. Since the sticker has never been on products before, it will alarm people when they start seeing it on things. Being that our country is corporately run, they don't label them so that their sales won't suffer.
Lutz, C. Greg. "Genetically Modified Organisms: A Continuing Controversy." Aquaculture Magazine 27.4 (2001): 8. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCO. Web. 24 May 2010.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Which is best
Blog #7: Authoritative Information
Most Reliable: I consider the Scitable website to have the most authoritative information. The fact that it has a clear author and that she is also a Ph.D. makes the article more credible. It covers point-by-point aspects and issues associated with genetically modified foods. Within the article there is a table that presents examples of genetic changes in various products. The article covers the current and potential use of GMOs, the risks and controversies – including economic, philosophic/religious, and natural issues, the history, and future research. Overall it appears to be a generally well rounded article.The article is from 2008 so it is not too dated. The author cites many resources and they are listed clearly at the end. The audience targeted seems to be people who are curious to know about what GMOs are and how they affect them.
Least Reliable: For me it was a tie for least reliable between the Monsanto website and saynotogmos.org. Due to my own bias I think that if I had to choose the least reliable I would say Monsanto because they just generally scare me. I believe these sites are tied because they both have a clear agenda.
For Monsanto it is to sell a product and inform people about what they do in terms of biotechnology and how it is safe and efficient way to approach agriculture. Their website was very clear and easily navigable. In addition to the text, there are embedded videos with some man (CEO?) going over the points presented. I think these videos were attempting to give the information a certain authoritative aspect but I was too distracted by the man’s vague information and poor presence on camera. There is however, no discussion of unaltered food and the company clearly has a biased towards its own product and technology. There is no way to tell how old this actual article is but the website overall has been updated in 2010. The content seems to target investors to the company giving them a little background on the basic concepts behind breeding and biotechnology.
For saynotogmos.com the authors are attempting to convince readers that GMOs are not safe. In their mission statement they state that they support “mandatory labeling, long-term independent safety testing, more stringent regulation and full corporate liability for damages resulting from the irresponsible introduction of GMOs to the food supply and environment.” After reading that I totally agree with their mission, which is not to necessarily ban all GMOs but to allow a consumer choice and government regulations on foods produced by these bioengineering companies. Nonetheless, the information is incredibly biased; just look at the title of the website. I found this site to be the least navigable and I believe that a revamp of the layout would boost their legitimacy (in a visual sense, readers will naturally consider it more credible) to the average web surfer or researcher. The website has updates every year up to 2010, so the information is definitely up to date. It is nice that you can look back and see change and development of information regarding GMOs over time. The audience seems to be, put bluntly, “liberals” who want to reinforce their beliefs by reading a bunch of articles. <--I’m not hating, go liberals!
1. Genetically modified foods really freak me out, but I’ve come to realize it is almost impossible to completely avoid them considering products are not labeled. But I do understand that genetic modification is not a brand new science and that it is beneficial in the growth of agriculture.
2. There is no reason a person should not know where their food comes from. So I think it is ludicrous that the FDA does not require labeling, especially if all of Europe does. *But I guess it’s just us Americans trying to be rebels with no universal health care and no labeling of GMOs. (*sorry that is kind of annoying)
Gerdes, Louise. Humanity's Future. 1st ed. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Print.
Blog #7
Blog 7
Monday, May 10, 2010
Food Inc
When watching one issue that was brought to my attention is the monopoly of meat in our world today. With the fast food industries running everything from beef, pork, chicken, potatoes, and even apples. With this being controlled by monopolies you would think if you don’t eat their food you want be affected right, WRONG. All the products produces are affected by these monopolies. In order to make all the meats taste the same everything has to be combined into one, and while monopolies get what they want, I guess you can say is the meat that we eat is sloppy seconds.
This brings me to my next point of how these industries handle themselves in our society. Though these industries may create jobs, it is also causing conflict between those hurt and those in power. In the beginning African Americans took these jobs, but as time goes on we see outsourcing happening which creates cheaper labor. Illegal immigrants are brought into work, which is seen as acceptable because it’s cheap and they’re not doing anything else besides prepping the meat for American consumers to eat. The thing that I find funny is how this continues to happen, but the meat industries continue to devalue these workers. In Food Inc. they say that the pigs that were being bread were more of a value to them than their workers.
To sum all this up I can use one ward CAPITALISM. Capitalism is defined in the Webster dictionary “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market” (Wester, 2010). Seeing that we are brought up in a capitalistic society people fell that its only right to have every aspect of life based on it. Which bring me to my last statement of only the strong will survive and if our society keeps on this pace its only a matter of time till our life expectancy declines and we continue to die off earlier than expected.
Food Inc.
Blog 6: Food Inc
Blog #6: Food Inc.
Food Inc. was a very interesting film, it repulsed me in two ways: first, the treatment of the animals and second, the corporate industry in and of itself. I was flabbergasted to hear how corrupt the food industry actually is. It seems completely wrong for there to be three or so major corporations in charge of our entire food supply and that how they exploit farmers across the nation. I really can’t comprehend how any government official could know and even be in cahoots with such a system. Well… I can comprehend it because I know that it goes on in the food industry as well as the pharmaceutical industry and I’m sure many more. But it disgusts me that people with so much power care so little about the greater good. In the film they showed the story of the family who had to choose between healthy food and the father’s diabetes medication. When I was listening to their story I was so sad because they are being detrimentally affected by two of the, in my opinion, most evil industries. It hurt me to hear that in paying for the medication and eating fast food their youngest daughter was likely to be diagnosed with early onset diabetes. And if in the future the daughters remain in the same income bracket (with the assumption that the system does not change) the process will repeat itself. I was shocked to hear the statistics that 1 in 3 American children born after the year 2000 will be diagnosed with diabetes, and 1 in 2 for minority children.
When they compared the food industry with the tobacco industry, I felt that kind of ray of hope considering the downfall of the tobacco industry. But I still felt kind of doubtful about the whole thing because if you think about it, the tobacco industry had a pretty large market, but they had nowhere near the market of food. Everyone eats food, you can’t just not, but not everyone smokes. This difference I think is very integral to thinking of the industry because to me, it reflects how big, influential, and basically all controlling industry it must be if they affect every single person in the country. When the film talked about Monsanto and the soybean operations, I couldn’t believe what I heard, that 90% of the soybeans in the U.S. are their patented gene… Are you kidding me? That just seems creepy and unnatural. And then of course how all the farmers are being sued for the wind blowing over Monsanto patented soybean pollen.
When watching the part about the actual animals, I shielded my eyes a few times because it just made me sick to see their living/pre-dying conditions. The filth of the chicken, cow, pig farms was awful and to think how easily E. coli can develop. The mother’s story was really heart wrenching and you wonder why corporations will not do anything to literally clean up their industries. I really did not know how little the USDA and FDA did for the safety of the citizens. It’s really hard to think about our government not caring enough about its citizens to make their primary source of living safe.
I could say a lot more but I think I’ll end this. I hope that the food industry will be reformed for the future generations.
Robbin Shoemaker, et al. United States Department of Agriculture. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Economic Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. AIB762 64 pp, March 2001. Web. 10 May 2010.
food inc
Monday, May 3, 2010
Farmers Market
Blog #5: Farmers' Market
I always loved going to the Farmers’ Market at home with my mom. I always thought it was really nice to be able to go and see tons of different foods on display so beautifully sans packaging and being greeted by un-uniformed smiling faces along with those of your neighbors. Going to the Bellingham Farmer’s Market reminded me of how great it is to be in such an environment.
At the market I decided to purchase organic and local mushrooms, chèvre, lettuce, and shallots. Looking around and searching through the different vendors whose goods sometimes overlapped was exciting and felt like kind of an adventure. For my cheese I stopped at the Gothberg Farms’ stand and had a great time trying the different types of cheeses. Interestingly enough, I had already had the chance to try their cheese after purchasing some from Metropolitan Market in Seattle. After buying the cheese, I went through the market and found my produce.
For my recipe I decided to make a mushroom and chèvre tart accompanied with a green salad with shallots and vinaigrette. I had been planning on making this in the near future and this little excursion to the Farmers’ Market gave me a great excuse. The tart was made from puff pastry covered with goat cheese and topped with sautéed mushrooms and shallots. I made a light vinaigrette for the salad composed of: wine vinegar, a little lemon, thyme, olive oil, and salt and pepper. The meal was very fresh and “spring-y,” and my roommates and I thoroughly enjoyed it.
I’m really glad that we had this assignment because it finally got me out to the Farmers’ Market for the first time in Bellingham and I am looking forward to going again!
Mead, Nathanial. "The Sprawl of Food Deserts.."Environmental Health Perspectives 116.8 (2008): A 335. Web. 3 May 2010.
Blog 5: Farmer's Market
Farmer's Market
Shivani, Vora,. "A Virtual Farmer's Market." A Virtual Farmer's Market. 32.3 (2010): 107. Academic Search Complete. Web.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Blog 4: You Are What You Eat
Home Grown
Monday, April 26, 2010
BLog #4: You are what you eat
The statement ‘you are what you eat’ is an interesting concept to ponder. I understand that in believing this concept I am a very strange mix of things. In general I am a terrible (unhealthy) college student. I smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, and participate in many of the things that you would associate with that lifestyle. When I think about exercise I feel kind of bad about myself. I love being healthy and working out, but basically I am just too lazy. During the summer I work out every day but when I return to school I just stop and give up. Doing it is not hard but I lose all motivation.
In addition to being this “unhealthy” person, I am also a conscious eater, and I enjoy eating organic, local, and whole grain foods. Every morning I eat a pretty balanced breakfast consisting of a combination of some of the following items: yogurt with frozen or fresh berries, granola, grapefruit, green tea, english muffins, cream of wheat, eggs, etc. After breakfast I take a multivitamin, Vitamin C, and fish oil. I follow these with my prescription and cigarettes (ahhhh!!!). Generally, I start off my day pretty well nutrition-wise, but come dinner it’s not always too good. Throughout the day I often forget to eat, but I am a water addict so I am always hydrated. I enjoy foods with stories and meaning behind them and I think a lot about the recipes that I make and I like to utilize the ingredients and styles my mother uses in her own kitchen. But at times, like a stereotypical college student, I get lazy and sometimes all I want to do is order a pizza or go to McDonalds. And I choose these relatively cheap and easy alternatives because I simply enjoy them and I don’t try to deny it. In dealing with and discussing fast food I feel no reason to stigmatize it because the way I see it is ‘what the hell?’ I might as well eat what I want and what I will enjoy at the moment because I know that fast food is not the only cuisine in my repertoire. So, I’ll just say it… I love fast food!
In taking prescription medication (*not recreationally) I experience a conflict with the ideals that I was raised with and my own personal opinion, which strangely enough are congruent. My family definitely frowns upon most, if not all, prescription medication. I am definitely not a proponent of the drugs but in my case they make my life easier. I am pretty hypocritical when I discuss prescription medication because generally, I take the opposing side and then am forced to confront the fact that I myself am a prescription drug patient.
Combs, Gerald. The Vitamins : Fundamental Aspects in Nutrition and Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992. Print.
I am what I eat
The quote stats that "you are what you eat". This process for me began when I was just a little fetus inside of my mother’s stomach. When she would eat things when pregnant with me it would nourish my body and influence the future me. After birth this process continued, I continued the lifestyle of slowly becoming what I eat. When a child I would be force to eat things like chicken, pork, beef. I had no option because I was young and it was the responsibility of my parents to install a great eating habit when young so when I got out on my own I would be good. This is exactly what happened. As I got older I begin to be more dependent on myself regarding what I ate. With more say so I begin to investigate what I put in my body, becoming more knowledgeable of how a particular food would affect me. Through this investigation censors went up and I became a more chases of what was put into my body. I begin to take things out of my diet like some pork products, seasonings, junk food, and anything else that would have to dramatic impact on my health. As I continued to watch what I ate, I also begin taking vitamins and sports drinks becoming more aware of what my body needs to maintain itself due to the hard lifestyle that I live. Seeing that I’m an individual who is active in terms of fitness, there are certain requirements that need to be meeting in order to maintain that figure. Some of the things I do personally are drinking lots of water for hydration purposes, eat lots of fruit, drinking lots of milk, eating fish and red meat, and the list goes on and on. Without these item I may not be what I am today, it makes me who I am which can be defined as “I am what I eat.”
"That's what happens when you only eat orange food"
When it comes to the statement “ You are what you eat”. I’ve always thought of it as health wise. I have heard that said so many times throughout my life and I have never really stopped to think about its meaning in depth.
I guess I always just figured it meant that if I ate too much I would become overweight, or if I ate junk food I would become weak and unhealthy, and that by eating healthy food and the right amount I would be the way I was supposed to be.
I remember when I was younger around five or six, I liked to eat a lot of orange things, like carrots, oranges, macaroni and cheese, goldfish crackers, and so on, and I saw a girl that was literally orange, I looked at my babysitter and whispered “oh my goodness, that girl is orange, why is she orange?” and she look at me and said “that’s what happens when you only eat orange food”. From then on I tried to add more color variety to my food. Now looking back on it, it must have just been a bad fake tan or something, but at the time it had quite a drastic effect on my eating habits.
I feel like at this point in my life I eat almost as healthy as I can. Often I would rather eat healthier, I would like to always eat organic and only eat the meat of animals that were treated right (well as right as an animal can be to be raised to eat), or eggs that are free range. At this point in my life as a college student I just don’t have the money. I really wish I could afford to buy certain types of food, but right now it’s just not really an option. When you look at it at the store it doesn’t seem that much different but when you look at your receipts from a couple months it really adds up fast. I hope in the future to have my own garden and grow my own vegetables, and maybe raise a couple chickens, just for eggs and such, and hopefully eventually ill be able to afford to buy the certain types of food I would like to be eating. I think that is probably an issue for a lot of people. I can feel it to when I eat unhealthy; I feel it in my energy level and just my overall experience of each day.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
harvesting
If you harvesting your own food, I believe that yes there will be a stronger connection to the source of food opposed to buying in a convent store. When harvesting the food the connection will be stronger primarily because of the connection that you form with the harvesting item. I have been taught that if you work for something; putting your time, money, or energy into getting it, there seems to be more personal value. I can mostly relate this to my person life in terms of cooking. I ask the question is there a stronger connection between you and the food if you where to cook it personally vs. a fast food restaurant to cook it for you. In this situation I would say that when you cook your own item you know the process that the product went through to get to where it currently is. Spending your time to prepare it specially for your own specific taste. You know how you like it and that’s the way it will end up after personally prepared. If you go to a fast food restaurant, you have no idea of the process of preparing your food. You have no input and the presentation of your item will be different every time. You won’t have your specific taste that you like satisfying all your needs in terms of nutrition.
Another aspect of harvesting can been see as maintenance of your own meat; meaning the killing, cleaning, and eating of an animal. Personally I would be more likely to eat my own meat then those that are pre packaged. You have no idea what they do to their meat in preparation for packing. By partaking in your own personal system of producing meat you know everything about it and if something where to happen to you, you may be able to pinpoint where it came from. But by not preparing it yourself you have no idea of what you’re eating.
What I personally find funny is how on a box of cereal, mac & cheese, or any other pre boxed item the have the products that it was made from. If you look at some pre package meat items there is none. Why is this?
Books
Doorley, Tom and Johann Doorley. Grow and cook. Irish Books and Media Inc, 2007.
Drinkwater, Carol. The olive farm : a love story. Vision Australia Information and Library Service, 2005.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Blog #3: Harvesting Food
I would definitely think that growing, hunting, and gathering your own food would give you a stronger connection to what you are eating. First hand I really only know of the gardening aspect because of my mother’s garden. Although I have had some glimpses of the hunting and fishing aspect. My mother’s family comes from the Midwest and she has always talked about how my grandfather grew up and continued hunting with bow and arrows, fishing, and collecting wild mushrooms during her childhood. Those things sound pretty foreign to me seeing that I had a pretty urban childhood growing up in Seattle. My uncles dabble in the hunting, but fishing and mushroom hunting are still pastimes of theirs.
The connections talked about in those articles all seemed really powerful and important, but I really don’t think I could ever be a hunter. Buying meat in the grocery store is kind of hard for me because I’ve grown up eating organic meats – even if they aren’t that much better – but being a college student with limited funds, I often buy meat that I would not be served at my dinner table at home. I do indeed lament over the fact that sometimes I have to make a bad meat decision, but in a way knowing how badly an animal was raised make me feel a connection with the source, however this connection is one of guilt and sorrow.
I do believe that hunting is moral and that people should have the right to choose and pursue the food that they want, especially considering the environmental and economical gains. Ideally no food would be wasted and the revolutionary neo-American-hunters could change the system and all harmful animal practices would stop, leaving a harmony of hunters and farmers.
In reaction to Steve Rinella’s plan of a feast based on Escoffier’s Guide Culinaire, I say right on! Although some of the things I was reading didn’t quite sit right with me I would be more than happy to attend the dinner oblivious to the procurement and preparation of the food.
Redman, Nina. Food safety : a reference handbook. 1st. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2000. Print.
O'Connor, Jack, and George Goodwin. The big game animals of North America. 1st. New York, NY: Outdoor Life, 1961. Print.
meataterian?
I would have to say that harvesting your own food certainly gives you a stronger connection to it. I would compare it to having to earn your allowance and appreciating the toys you can buy with the money you worked so hard for. vs. if your parents just put the toy in front of you at the request. If you take the time to grow food, water it, nurture and so on, then the time invested in them will make you fully appreciate every bite! My mom was a huge gardener and always had some fresh vegetables so I really grew to appreciate her efforts. On the other end of the spectrum, my dad is a hunter and brother is a fisher. I would say I have grown to appreciate where the food comes from and have a new value for it while I'm eating. I would definitely say its a good thing in most instances but I don't think it's very realistic to eat harvested food for everybody on a regular basis. I think I would be less likely to eat meat if I had to butcher every animal I ate just because of the inconvenience. However, if all food had to be harvested entirely, I would definitely eat far more meat. I think hunting is certainly moral, people have been doing it since the start of people. Buying the meat for sale doesn't mean that your saving the animal that you would have to kill. Two wrongs don't make a right and if everybody did harvest their own food, then less would be produced for the masses.
Griffith, Chris. Food Sustainability: Diverging Implications. Bradford, England: Emerald Group, 2004. E-Book.
Seymour, John. The Self-Sufficient Gardener: A Complete Guide to Growing and Preserving All Your Own Food. Garden City, N.Y. Doubleday, 1979. Print.